A Brief History of the Ministry of the Congregation

of Holy Cross among the Hispanic People of Austin, Texas

 

The history of Holy Cross ministry among the Hispanic people of Austin appears at first to be largely a story of the development of parish churches. Behind this building of parishes, though, are stories of Holy Cross religious who worked with the Hispanic people to build more than edifices—they worked to build a Church that would include all people of Austin and Central Texas. This survey, then, attempts to provide a sketch of how the Catholic Church, with the help of Holy Cross religious, developed to include and serve more fully the Hispanic people. Construction of churches is part of the story and is surely included here, but the more important part of the story is the consideration of the people whose lives are bound up with the development of these churches and of the Church.  

Beginnings

 The story of Holy Cross’s ministry to the Hispanic people begins with a sick man—Fr. Patrick

 O’Reilly [see fig. 1]. O’Reilly had tuberculosis, and in 1900, in hopes that the mild Texas climate

 would foster his recovery, he came to Austin to live among the Holy Cross religious there (Dunne

 15). Not finding the health he had hoped for, O’Reilly ended up in Seton Hospital, and was given

 four days to live. According to tradition, O’Reilly, aware of the lack of pastoral care for the

 Mexican-American people in the area, promised Our Lady of Guadalupe that if he recovered from

 his illness, he would dedicate the rest of his life to these people (Culhane, “History” 1). He did at

 least temporarily recover, learned Spanish, and started providing pastoral ministry to Austin’s

 Hispanics. He began saying masses with “instructions in Spanish” every Sunday at St. Mary’s

 Church, which was the only Catholic church in the city then. By 1907, O’Reilly oversaw the opening

 of the first Hispanic parish in the city, Our Lady of Guadalupe, located at the intersection of Fifth

 and Guadalupe Streets [see fig. 2] (Dunne 15). According to Christopher J. O’Toole, the parish size

 burgeoned quickly to include 3,000 people (4). A school was established for the Hispanic children of

 the area. During the pastorate of O’Toole’s successors at Our Lady of Guadalupe, Fathers Walter

 O’Donnell and Angus MacDonald, Sisters of the Holy Cross came to teach in the school (Dunne

 16-17). Holy Cross continued to staff Our Lady of Guadalupe until 1925, when, according to John

Korcsmar, the Indiana Province of Holy Cross (the only U.S. province at that time) called at its

 chapter meeting for an increased number of Holy Cross religious to serve at the University of Notre

 Dame. Thus, lacking manpower in the south, Holy Cross turned over the pastoral care of Our Lady

 of Guadalupe to the Oblates of Mary Immaculate.

The next development of note was the establishment of a new parish in Austin south of the Colorado River, St. Ignatius Martyr. Finding the people of South Austin in need of a church, the Congregation coordinated efforts in constructing the first St. Ignatius Church in 1939. Patrick Duffy was the first pastor. The church was located on Johanna Street in south Austin, and initially mainly served the white people of the area (Dunne 26-27; Houser I). This parish is important to the area of interest here because the mother parish of what would be called the “Mexican missions,” San Jose, discussed below, was formed out of St. Ignatius Parish territory. Holy Cross continues to staff St. Ignatius Parish today, with a larger church on Oltorf Street, and with 1-lispanics comprising more than half of the 2,500 families (O’Toole 17).

 

Fr. Alfred Mendez and the San Jose Missions

 

In 1936, the Superior General of the Congregation, James Donahue, sent a newly ordained priest, Alfred Mendez, to Austin to establish “home missions” among the Hispanic and black people [see fig. 31. Mendez began his work north of the Colorado River, which was then within the diocese of Galveston. He grew ill, and ended up in Santa Rosa Hospital in San Antonio. In the hospital, he met San Antonio Archbishop Arthur Drossaerts, who was also a patient. Drossaerts asked Mendez to establish a Mexican-American parish south of the Colorado River in Austin, in the San Antonio archdiocese (Dunne 27; Houser 1). Mendez recovered from his illness and began coordinating mission efforts south of the river to the Hispanic people, initially basing his efforts at St. Edward’s University (Houser 1). Donahue’s term as Superior General expired, and he came to Texas to assist Mendez in his work. These two men, along with Joseph Houser and Thomas Culhane, went from house to house in their missionary outreach before any church was constructed [see figs. 4-51. Brother Lambert Barbier, who was the community cook and was familiar with the area, often served as the driver for these mission trips, and brought food for the people who were visited (Dunne 28, Korcsmar interview). Also, Mendez had Spanish services at St. Ignatius Parish until San Jose Parish was established (Dunne 28; Culhane, “History” 5).

Mendez wished to establish a system of missions, with one mother church, to serve the           

Spanish-speaking people of Austin. With the approval of Archbishop Drossaerts, two Austin

churches were built, along with other mission churches in surrounding small towns. San Jose

Church, which was to serve as the center of the missions, was constructed in South Austin, within

St. Ignatius Parish boundaries, at the intersection of Third and Mary streets [see flg.6]. San

Francisco Javier was constructed southeast of the city on the Lockhart Highway (now U.S.

Highway 183, south of Austin-Bergstrom International Airport) [see fig. 7]. Both San Jose and San

Francisco were dedicated in 1941 (Dunne 28). in 1946, a third Austin-area mission church was

completed, Nuestra Señora de La Luz, in the Hispanic neighborhood of Montopolis east of

downtown [see fig. 8] (Houser 2). Mendez served as pastor of this mission chain of churches from

1939 to 1948. Many priests served as Mendez’ assistants during these years [see appendix 1]

(Houser 2-3).

     Mendez’s vision and system of missionary activity have on occasion provoked some criticism. Though he worked to establish churches for Hispanic people, he did not intend for these churches to continue for a long period of time as strictly ethnic or national parishes. According to John Korcsmar, Mendez favored the “melting pot” concept of society, and wanted the Spanish-speaking churches only to serve in a transitional capacity. One of Mendez’s closest friends and associates, Peter Mueller, writes in a reflection after Mendez’s death that he “wanted integration not segregation” [see fig. 9]. Mendez began an English mass at San Jose parish as soon as the younger generation of Mexican-American parishioners spoke English well, and sometimes encouraged these younger people to attend mass at the less predominantly Hispanic St. Ignatius (Mueller 3).

     Korcsmar says that Mendez’s construction style of the churches reflects his vision as well. The church buildings were relatively inexpensive to construct, since the building materials consisted of used or free items—railroad ties, field stones for San Jose and La Luz, street car poles (Austin had ended its street car system to begin the city bus service), cedar logs, and telegraph poles (“Secondhand” 24). The churches have received praise for their simple, sturdy mission style, being referred to as “majestically rustic” (Secondhand” 24; Powers 38). Mendez had the designs for the churches drawn up, without being charged any fee, by architectural students at Notre Dame (Culhane, “San Francisco” 1). In addition, as Korcsmar says, Mendez built nothing more than a church and a parish hail at each of the church locations, since he wanted parishioners at the missions to become more inculturated by coming to one rectory or parish center for pastoral care.

     Pastorally, Mendez did love and serve the Hispanic people, however his vision of Church may appear to our twenty-first century eyes. He set up a system of “captains” among the Hispanic people, whereby certain parishioners were responsible for reporting any pastoral needs within the parish to Mendez or his associates when they were at the churches. Mueller writes that because of this system, “. . . there was not a Mexican we knew of who died without the sacraments” (2). Mendez continually stressed the importance of education for Hispanic people, and was not beyond using methods that were a little unorthodox. At one point, he authorized Mueller, for example, to preach at masses that children must attend school according to Texas state education laws, and to cite California cases in which parents had been fined for not sending children to school. The enrollment at the school subsequently quadrupled, so that the Hispanic students were taken to a larger school facility that could accommodate them—the school for whites. In Mueller’s words, “there was instant integration” (5). Mueller writes (years after ministry in the San Jose Missions) that he and Mendez may or may not have used the best system of pastoral care in the 1 940s, but that they did look upon the Hispanic people whom they served ‘~as equals,” and spoke with them “eye to eye” (5). Mendez, whatever his vision, established a series of Hispanic parishes that have continued to serve the Hispanic people of Austin and Central Texas since their foundation.

Toward Parish Autonomy

    In 1948, Joseph Houser succeeded Mendez as pastor of San Jose Parish and the missions

 grouped with it. Early on in his pastorate, Houser showed he did not ascribe to Mendez’s vision for

 the San Jose Missions. He began a development plan that eventually transformed the mission

 churches into more typically characteristic ethnic U.S. parishes (Korcsmar). Houser oversaw the

 construction of a new San Jose Church (relocated to 2425 Oak Crest Street), a parish school, a

 medical clinic, and a day care center [see fig. 101 (O’Toole 24; Dunne 45). La Luz and San

 Francisco Javier Parishes saw significant development under Houser’s leadership as well.  

When La Luz Church was built in 1946, Montopolis Drive was the only paved road in the neighborhood. Following the development of Bergstrom Field nearby during and after World War II, though, more Hispanic families moved into the Montopolis neighborhood (Culhane, “San Francisco” 2). In 1948, the same year that the Austin Diocese was established, Montopolis was incorporated into the city of Austin (Houser 2). With this growth in the parish, La Luz Church became too small to accommodate all the parishioners. In 1953, a new church was dedicated in the Montopolis neighborhood under the new name of Nuestra Señora de los Siete Dolores, since Austin’s Bishop Louis Reicher had stated the parish should be named after a feast day found in the missal [see fig. 11]. Under Houser’s development plan, Dolores Parish was also given its own rectory and pastor, Charles Delaney, and San Francisco Javier became a mission of Dolores (Houser 4). Delaney is known to have been beloved by the people of San Francisco and Dolores. He enacted Houser’s vision for development by establishing a school at Dolores Parish (Korcsmar interview).

San Francisco Javier Parish saw a decrease in the number of parishioners as La Luz / Dolores grew in size. At the time of its founding in 1941, the parish served more than four hundred Spanish-speaking families (“Joint Jubilee” article). Subsequently, some parishioners moved to Montopolis and La Luz / Dolores Parish when this nearby neighborhood developed, while a number of members of the younger generation of Mexican Americans moved away from the area altogether (Culhane, “San Francisco” 2). San Francisco was a mission of San Jose from 1941 to 1953, and of Dolores from 1953 to 1957. In 1957, Elmer Rupp became the first pastor of San Francisco Javier Parish [see fig. 12] (Dunne 46). For years, Rupp lived in a back part of the parish hail because no rectory had been built at San Francisco and because funding was scarce (Culhane, “San Francisco” 3). Rupp served as pastor until 1978, when he was succeeded by John Haley [see fig. 13]. Haley helped to develop the parish facilities further, coordinating an expansion to the church as the number of parishioners increased to include a heterogeneous mixture of whites and Hispanics (O’Toole 23). Holy Cross continued to staff San Francisco until February of 2000, when, because of fewer Holy Cross priests available in Austin to maintain apostolic commitments, the pastoral leadership of the parish was assumed by the Diocese of Austin.

Community Improvement in Montopolis and Charismatic Renewal

In 1962, Fred Underwood became pastor of Dolores Parish in Montopolis [see fig. 14]. Underwood, seeing the need for assistance and change in this neighborhood sometimes referred to as “poverty island,” embarked on an ambitious program of neighborhood development. With the assistance of Elmer Rupp, Underwood worked with the people of the neighborhood to develop a non-profit, non-sectarian Community Center on Montopolis Drive. Since the Center was not technically sponsored by the Church and was not to offer religious education of any kind, it was funded by a government loan and became a collaborative effort of local, state, and national governments (O’Toole 19-22). Programs offered at the Center over the next few years included adult continuing education, a Youth Corps targeted at school dropouts, day care and Head Start programs, job referrals, and the availability of social workers. Underwood also pushed to have a bus line extended from the Montopolis neighborhood to central Austin, where people could catch the public busses (O’Toole 20). Underwood’s next major building project was housing development on land that was owned by Dolores Parish, funded by a two million dollar loan that Underwood had secured from the Diocese of Austin (Dunne 45; O’Toole 22). Also during Underwood’s time as pastor of Dolores, the religious education program improved. Brother Joel Giallanza became catechetical director and a group of Franciscan Sisters began serving the parish as religious educators. in 1972, Underwood brought the fervor of the charismatic prayer movement to Dolores Parish (Korcsmar interview). The prayer movement at Dolores Parish reflected to some extent the city- and nation-wide charismatic wave of that time. The next two pastors of Dolores Parish were Steven Lambour and Joel Atwood, who continued the neighborhood and parish work Underwood had begun (Dunne 45).

 

Into Contemporary Times: Developments at San Jose and Dolores

 

As was mentioned above, Joseph Houser was Alfred Mendez’s successor as the pastor of San Jose Parish, and it was during Houser’s pastorate that San Jose ceased being the mother parish of other mission parishes. Houser served as pastor of San Jose from 1948 to 1967, and his successor was John Haley, who, as was discussed above, was the second pastor of San Francisco Javier Parish. During Haley’s time as pastor of San Jose, a large community center was built to

accompany the school and church Fr. Houser had constructed (Korcsmar interview). In 1976, John Korcsmar became pastor of San Jose Parish. He emphasized social justice issues among parishioners, and worked to form the neighborhood into the South Austin Neighborhood Council, whose function was, among other things, to help children who were classified as “problem kids” or had dropped out of school. Korcsmar also began organizing Austin Interfaith, a political partnership among various faith denominations that grew out of the Communities Organized for Public Service (C.O.P.S.) program in San Antonio (Reese 34).

 

In 1982, Korcsmar was named pastor of Dolores Parish, while Underwood, who had been vocation director after his pastorate at Dolores, was named pastor of San Jose. As pastor of San Jose, Underwood continued to emphasize the charismatic prayer movement, San Jose became something of a city-wide, area, charismatic church (Korcsmar interview). With so many people from around the city coming to worship at San Jose, the church built by Fr. Houser became too small. Underwood then oversaw the construction of a massive new San Jose Church that Bishop John McCarthy dubbed the “Cathedral of South Austin.” Underwood was pastor of San Jose until 1993, when the Diocese of Austin assumed pastoral control of the parish.

     At Dolores Parish, meanwhile, Korcsmar continued his work in the area of social justice (see fig. 15). With Korcsmar and other pastors’ support, Austin Interfaith grew into a much larger collaborative effort. The coalition works to improve neighborhoods, schools, and workplaces. It became affiliated with the Texas Industrial Areas Foundation Network (I.A.F.), an umbrella organization that includes programs similar to Austin Interfaith from around the state. Austin Interfaith and 1.A.F. regularly sponsor “accountability sessions,” in which politicians are asked whether they share the social justice goals of the people in these organizations (McNeely).

Besides carrying forward the tradition of neighborhood empowerment and involvement as pastor of

 Dolores, Korcsmar has established programs to provide active lay persons with training grounded in

 theological education. Korcsmar continues as pastor of Dolores Parish today.

 

Conclusion

Dolores is the one parish that grew out of the San Jose Missions system that is still staffed by Holy Cross today. As the Southern Province of Holy Cross has developed some new (Hispanic and other) apostolic commitments outside of Austin and declined in active membership, the province has painfully had to withdraw from some long-standing Holy Cross parochial commitments. The story of how the parishes considered here developed is important for Holy Cross religious to remember, though, since this story gives us a sense of how we as a community have progressed to our current position. The Southern Province’s continuing commitment to Hispanic ministry reflects the reality that the heritage of Holy Cross in the South has been enriched by a history of service to the Hispanic people.

© Copyright 2000, Congregation of Holy Cross, Southern Province